In the 2010 case of S.N. v.M.B., the court found that neither a sperm donor nor an ice donor were the parents of a child conceived as a result of a donation in Franklin County, Ohio. There is no other published case law to set this precedent for other Ohio counties. The Ohio Juvenile Court is a law and tribunal that hears cases between single parents about their rights and duties to their children. This means that they apply the law to their decisions, but they also look at what is right. When an egg and sperm donor signs the contract and agrees to waive his parental rights and obligations and then attempts to sue parental rights, the Ohio Egg and Sperm Donor Agreement is used to demonstrate to the court that it would be unfair to grant them such a right. A family lawyer will also prove the parenting ability and benevolent interest of the child`s standard to argue your case. In Kansas, Jennifer Schreiner and Angela Bauer, a lesbian couple, ran an ad on Craigslist looking for a sperm donor. The cost of artificial insemination can range from $300 to $700 per trial, and it may take four or more attempts to succeed, an inexpensive process for some aspiring parents. Therefore, the couple was probably looking for a cheaper alternative to a sperm bank. William Marotta, a man married in the hope of helping the couple, replied that he would be a willing donor. Should a spouse accept artificial insemination? The couple involved in the Craigslist case were not married.
What if it was a heterosexual couple who respected the rights of the state in artificial insemination? If the husband of a married woman signs written consent for the use of a donor, the husband is considered the natural parent of the child. If the husband does not sign the consent, he would still be the presumed father. But he managed to overcome the assumption by showing that he disagreed. If the law only deals with sperm donors, is there any case law that defines that status in such a way as to provide the same protection for ice donors? Yes, the SN v. MB (2010) court found that neither a sperm donor nor an ice donor were the parents of a child. This decision applies to Franklin County, Ohio. There is no published case law to set a precedent for other Ohio counties.